Biomechanical behavior of different designs of hybrid abutment-restoration on the posterior crown: a finite element analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of material and crown design on the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns with hybrid abutment (HA) through three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The study factors were the type of material used as the mesostructure or crown (zirconia, lithium disilicate, and hybrid ceramic) and the crown design cemented to the titanium base (mesostructure cemented to the titanium base and a crown cemented on it (HaC); hybrid crown-abutment, the abutment and crown are manufactured as a single piece and cemented to the titanium base (HC); monolithic crown cemented on the titanium base and screwed to the implant (CS); and monolithic crown cemented on the titanium base (CC). Four 3D models were constructed using an implant with an internal connection, and an oblique load of 130 N was applied at 45° to the long axis of the implant. The models were evaluated using the von Mises stress for crown, abutment, screw, and implant and maximum principal stress for bone tissues. The lowest stresses occurred in the groups with a lower elastic modulus material, mainly hybrid ceramics, considered a material with greater resilience. The cemented crown group presented the lowest stress values. The stresses were concentrated in the cervical region of the crown at the titanium crown/base interface. Mesostructures made of materials with a higher elastic modulus exhibited a higher concentration of stress. The presence of a screw hole increased the stress concentration in the ceramic crown. Cemented ceramic crowns exhibited better biomechanical behavior than screw-retained crowns.

Biomechanical behavior of different designs of hybrid abutment-restoration on the posterior crown: a finite element analysis

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the influence of material and crown design on the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns with hybrid abutment (HA) through three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The study factors were the type of material used as the mesostructure or crown (zirconia, lithium disilicate, and hybrid ceramic) and the crown design cemented to the titanium base (mesostructure cemented to the titanium base and a crown cemented on it (HaC); hybrid crown-abutment, the abutment and crown are manufactured as a single piece and cemented to the titanium base (HC); monolithic crown cemented on the titanium base and screwed to the implant (CS); and monolithic crown cemented on the titanium base (CC). Four 3D models were constructed using an implant with an internal connection, and an oblique load of 130 N was applied at 45° to the long axis of the implant. The models were evaluated using the von Mises stress for crown, abutment, screw, and implant and maximum principal stress for bone tissues. The lowest stresses occurred in the groups with a lower elastic modulus material, mainly hybrid ceramics, considered a material with greater resilience. The cemented crown group presented the lowest stress values. The stresses were concentrated in the cervical region of the crown at the titanium crown/base interface. Mesostructures made of materials with a higher elastic modulus exhibited a higher concentration of stress. The presence of a screw hole increased the stress concentration in the ceramic crown. Cemented ceramic crowns exhibited better biomechanical behavior than screw-retained crowns.

Resumo O estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a influência do material e do desenho da coroa no comportamento biomecânico de coroas implanto-suportadas com pilar híbrido (AH) por meio da análise tridimensional (3D) de elementos finitos. Os fatores de estudo foram o tipo de material do HA ou coroa (zircônia, dissilicato de lítio e cerâmica híbrida) e o desenho da coroa sobre a base de titânio (mesoestrutura cimentada à base de titânio e coroa total cimentada em cerâmica; pilar e coroa fabricados em peça única cimentada à base de titânio; coroa monolítica cimentada sobre a base de titânio e aparafusada ao implante; e coroa monolítica cimentada à base de titânio). Quatro modelos 3D foram construídos e uma carga oblíqua de 130 N foi aplicada a 45° em relação ao longo eixo do dente. Os modelos foram avaliados utilizando a tensão de von Mises para a coroa, pilar, parafuso, implante e tensão principal máxima (tensão de tração) para o tecido ósseo. As menores tensões ocorreram nos grupos que apresentaram um material com menor módulo de elasticidade, principalmente a cerâmica híbrida, considerada um material com maior resiliência. Com relação às diferentes configurações, o modelo com coroa cimentada apresentou os menores valores de tensão. As tensões foram concentradas na região cervical da coroa na interface entre coroa e base de titânio. Mesoestruturas feitas de materiais com maior módulo de elasticidade exibiram maior concentração de tensões. A presença de um orifício para parafuso aumentou a concentração de tensão na coroa de cerâmica. As coroas cerâmicas cimentadas exibiram melhor comportamento biomecânico do que as coroas parafusadas.